[pull] main from electron:main #3

pull · 2021-08-25T02:58:57Z

See Commits and Changes for more details.

Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

commit-lint · 2021-08-25T02:59:00Z

Commit-Lint commands

You can trigger Commit-Lint actions by commenting on this PR:

@Commit-Lint merge patch will merge dependabot PR on "patch" versions (X.X.Y - Y change)
@Commit-Lint merge minor will merge dependabot PR on "minor" versions (X.Y.Y - Y change)
@Commit-Lint merge major will merge dependabot PR on "major" versions (Y.Y.Y - Y change)
@Commit-Lint merge disable will desactivate merge dependabot PR
@Commit-Lint review will approve dependabot PR
@Commit-Lint stop review will stop approve dependabot PR

mergify · 2022-04-15T16:33:26Z

@pull-request-quantifier[bot] is not allowed to run commands

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-26T19:09:52Z

This PR has 137834 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80898 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13186 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-26T19:09:53Z

This PR has 137834 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80898 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13186 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-26T19:09:53Z

This PR has 137834 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80898 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13186 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T01:45:49Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T01:45:53Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T10:08:55Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T10:10:43Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T10:12:23Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T10:13:37Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T10:15:22Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T10:16:22Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T10:16:23Z

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T14:53:41Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T14:59:03Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:02:36Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:02:43Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:03:30Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:04:22Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:09:21Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:09:31Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:10:28Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T15:12:23Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T20:25:59Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated · 2024-01-29T20:28:45Z

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

Fast and predictable releases to production:
- Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
  iterations.
- Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
- Bugs are more likely to be detected.
- Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
- Small portions can be assimilated better.
Better engineering practices are exercised:
- Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
- Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
- Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
- Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
- Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
Change your engineering behaviors
- For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
  - Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
  - Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

One line was added: +1 -0
One line was deleted: +0 -1
One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

fix: broken OOP printing on macOS/Linux

* 5786874: Change Observer: Fix crash when navigating to new page https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5786874 * 5794141: Change Observer: Fix Get*PermissionGrant crash https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5794141

Bumps [mikefarah/yq](https://github.com/mikefarah/yq) from 4.44.6 to 4.45.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/mikefarah/yq/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/mikefarah/yq/blob/master/release_notes.txt) - [Commits](mikefarah/yq@4839dbb...8bf425b) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: mikefarah/yq dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 3.28.0 to 3.28.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](github/codeql-action@48ab28a...b6a472f) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: github/codeql-action dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

#45277) chore: align clipboard blink::web_pref::WebPreferences with upstream

…45252)

* fix: webContents.print() with OOP printing * Update patches/chromium/printing.patch Co-authored-by: Robo <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Robo <[email protected]>

fixes 0e5fe3f regression

refactor: simplify ParseUserScript() local variable user_script no longer needed after #43205

…l<string>` (#45270) refactor: simplify StopTracing() a little by using a string_view instead of an optional<string> We have compile-time string literals that we're passing to a method that takes a string_view argument, so we don't need all this extra optional<string> scaffolding

… ozone/wayland (#45171) * fix: backport patch to fix systemd unit activation in Chromium This backports a patch from Chromium, which fixes systemd unit activation. That is, a globalShortcuts feature that Chromium has needs to create a systemd unit and rename it properly. Portal's global shortcuts uses that name afterwards to map the app with the shortcuts bound. However, there might be a race between Chromium binding shortcuts and renaming the unit. This is a first step to add Portal's globalShortcuts to Electron. * feat: Support global shortcuts via GlobalShortcutsPortal feature Chromium has a new feature called GlobalShortcutsPortal. It allows clients to use Portal's globalShortcuts to register and listen to shortcuts. This patches adds necessary bits, which allows Electron to use that feature. In order to make it work, one has to add --enable-features=GlobalShortcutsPortal Test: tested manually with a sample app. * docs: add GlobalShortcutsPortal feature to globalShortcuts docs Electron supports Portal's globalShortcuts API now via Chromium, and Electron apps can use that in a Wayland session. Update the docs with the required feature flag that must be passed to be able to use that implementation.

Bumps [actions/upload-artifact](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact) from 4.5.0 to 4.6.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases) - [Commits](actions/upload-artifact@6f51ac0...65c4c4a) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/upload-artifact dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

fix: potential crash in chrome.tabs.update()

* chore: bump node in DEPS to v22.11.0 * src: move evp stuff to ncrypto nodejs/node#54911 * crypto: add Date fields for validTo and validFrom nodejs/node#54159 * module: fix discrepancy between .ts and .js nodejs/node#54461 * esm: do not interpret "main" as a URL nodejs/node#55003 * src: modernize likely/unlikely hints nodejs/node#55155 * chore: update patch indices * crypto: add validFromDate and validToDate fields to X509Certificate nodejs/node#54159 * chore: fixup perfetto patch * fix: clang warning in simdjson * src: add receiver to fast api callback methods nodejs/node#54408 * chore: fixup revert patch * fixup! esm: do not interpret "main" as a URL * fixup! crypto: add Date fields for validTo and validFrom * fix: move ArrayBuffer test patch * src: fixup Error.stackTraceLimit during snapshot building nodejs/node#55121 * fix: bad rebase * chore: fixup amaro * chore: address feedback from review * src: revert filesystem::path changes nodejs/node#55015 --------- Co-authored-by: electron-roller[bot] <84116207+electron-roller[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>

feat: better logging if Node initialization fails

* build: migrate release builds to GHA * build: alter CI jobs release script

* docs: Add note about directly exposing Electron APIs in preload * Implement feedback

* feat: redesign preload APIs * docs: remove service-worker mentions for now * fix lint * remove service-worker ipc code * add filename * fix: web preferences preload not included * fix: missing common init * fix: preload bundle script error

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6948.0 * chore: update can_create_window.patch https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6151982 no patch code changes, but had to manually apply due to upstream context shear * chore: update proxy_config_monitor.patch no manual changes; patch applied with fuzz 2 Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6126219 * chore: update build_add_electron_tracing_category.patch Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6149256 * chore: update adjust_accessibility_ui_for_electron.patch https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6105650 no patch code changes, but had to manually apply due to upstream context shear * chore: e patches all * chore: use fully-qualified path for all.gn Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6154997 * chore: do not use a variable when assigning rtc_use_h264 Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6154997 * Move GlobalShortcutListenerLinux to //ui/base Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6097375 * [MPArch Guest View] Make WebPreferences queried per frame tree root Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6096390 * [Status Icons] Allow vector resources https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6139403 * [Extensions] Move MatchOriginAsFallbackBehavior to Mojom Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6141793 * Remove StrongAlias::Hasher Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6132291 * Rename text-change and select-change methods and related stuff Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6148816 * [Code Health] Remove stale feature EnableWebUsbOnExtensionServiceWorker https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6115161 * [Extensions Cleanup] Move creation of tab-based ports to factory method https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6143725 * refactor: add StatusIconGtk::SetIcon() Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6139403 copied from chrome/browser/status_icons/status_icon.cc * refactor: add TrayIconLinux::GetIcon() Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6139403 * chore: update feat_allow_usage_of_sccontentsharingpicker_on_supported_platforms.patch remove unused filter_ field * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6950.0 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6952.0 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6954.0 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6956.0 * chore: update Chromium patches * 6165749: Check scanout support in RenderableGpuMemoryBufferPool | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6165749 * 6106730: [Win] Use DXGI swapchains and DCOMP visuals in software mode | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6106730 * chore: update patches * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6958.0 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6960.0 * chore: update chromium patches * 6168371: Remove extensions GlobalShortcutListener wrapper | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6168371 * chore: update patches * 6161637: WebUI: Leverage build_webui() in chrome://translate-internals | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6161637 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6962.0 * 6177329: Remove policy.used_policy_certificates pref on ChromeOS | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6177329 * 6180524: Simplify logic in components/os_crypt/sync/BUILD.gn | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6180524 * 6144831: Enforce --disallow-v8-feature-flag-overrides in the renderer | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6144831 * chore: update patches * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6964.0 * 6181010: Ensure busy cursor does not show via LaunchWithoutSandbox | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6181010 * chore: update patches * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6966.0 * 6180598: [api] Remove Reallocate | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/6180598 * 6170781: [Refactor] Move UninstallExtension to ExtensionRegistrar. | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6170781 * chore: update filenames.libcxx.gni * 6168207: cdm: Remove widevine_cdm_version.h | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6168207 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 134.0.6968.0 * 6030552: [macOS] Allow using vibrancy with NativeWidgetNSWindowBridge | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6030552 * fix: use explicit copy to replace realloc impl https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/6180598 https://issues.chromium.org/issues/331326406 As per recommendation, "File an issue with Node to explicitly copy,because they copy under the hood anyway" * fixup! 6106730: [Win] Use DXGI swapchains and DCOMP visuals in software mode | https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6106730 * fix: undefine win32 StrCat https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6172292 * fix: //device/vr:directx_helpers breaking the build https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6064548 Upstreamed in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6186102 * fix: avoid calling ui::Layer::SetFillsBoundsOpaquely https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6175787 The layer opacity is determined by the background color's alpha value * fix: build with proprietary_codecs The explicit setting of rtc_use_h264 is no longer needed since https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/62380 * fix: increase empty trace file size threshold https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6176642 Traces now contain a net-constants property to allow them to be converted to a net log. These contain ~1240 new properties with formatted JSON data. * fix: node tests missing resource management globals https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6174695 * fixup! fix: use explicit copy to replace realloc impl * chore: disable focus handling test due to win32/ia32 regression --------- Co-authored-by: electron-roller[bot] <84116207+electron-roller[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Charles Kerr <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Keeley Hammond <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: VerteDinde <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Samuel Maddock <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Samuel Maddock <[email protected]>

* feat: ServiceWorkerMain * refactor: disconnect remote * handle version_info_ nullptr case * initiate finish request when possible and enumerate errors * explicit name for test method * oops * fix: wait for redundant version to stop before destroying * docs: clarify when undefined is returned * chore: remove extra semicolons

@dsanders11

) * build: create maintainer task issue template and disable blank issues * Implement review feedback by @dsanders11 * Rename issue template file

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot added the Extra Large label Aug 25, 2021

pull bot added ⤵️ pull and removed Extra Large labels Aug 25, 2021

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot added the Extra Large label Aug 25, 2021

samuelmaddock and others added 30 commits January 20, 2025 09:54

test: quit Finder (#45239)

90754e5

chore: skip flaky contentTracing test (#45240)

51a249f

fix: broken OOP window.print() on macOS/Linux (#45214)

7d05fb2

fix: broken OOP printing on macOS/Linux

fix: page scaling in silent mode printing (#45218)

83666dd

build: fix clang-format duplicate message (#45235)

81d12fa

chore: align clipboard blink::web_pref::WebPreferences with upstream (

0090d17

#45277) chore: align clipboard blink::web_pref::WebPreferences with upstream

ci: don't fail issue triage workflows if issue not found on project (#…

7a413ff

…45252)

fix: webContents.print() with OOP printing (#45266)

9d32b6d

* fix: webContents.print() with OOP printing * Update patches/chromium/printing.patch Co-authored-by: Robo <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Robo <[email protected]>

fix: consume the file permission callback when used (#45267)

e1762e6

fixes 0e5fe3f regression

refactor: simplify ParseUserScript() (#45269)

f5eba67

refactor: simplify ParseUserScript() local variable user_script no longer needed after #43205

ci: fix issue workflow failures (#45294)

d7b568a

docs: add DocCardList component for index doc (#45275)

cf67dc8

fix: potential crash in chrome.tabs.update() (#45276)

5aabb6b

fix: potential crash in chrome.tabs.update()

chore: better logging if Node initialization fails (#45286)

db7ef90

feat: better logging if Node initialization fails

build: migrate Windows release builds to GHA (#45137)

aafb1ba

* build: migrate release builds to GHA * build: alter CI jobs release script

docs: Add note about directly exposing Electron APIs in preload (#45241)

26d228c

* docs: Add note about directly exposing Electron APIs in preload * Implement feedback

feat: redesign preload APIs (#45230)

e09577b

* feat: redesign preload APIs * docs: remove service-worker mentions for now * fix lint * remove service-worker ipc code * add filename * fix: web preferences preload not included * fix: missing common init * fix: preload bundle script error

feat: contextBridge.executeInMainWorld (#45229)

9964771

build: create maintainer issue template and disable blank issues (#45309

f66a0c2

) * build: create maintainer task issue template and disable blank issues * Implement review feedback by @dsanders11 * Rename issue template file

docs: fix broken code in drag and drop example (#45332)

5c67cd9

build: use windows builders for win-publish (#45340)

74c6669

[pull] main from electron:main #3

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[pull] main from electron:main #3

Conversation

pull bot commented Aug 25, 2021 • edited Loading

commit-lint bot commented Aug 25, 2021 • edited Loading

Features

Continuous Integration

Code Refactoring

Chore

Tests

Bug Fixes

Documentation

Contributors

mergify bot commented Apr 15, 2022

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 26, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 26, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 26, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

pull-request-quantifier-deprecated bot commented Jan 29, 2024

What can I do to optimize my changes

pull bot commented Aug 25, 2021 •

edited

Loading

commit-lint bot commented Aug 25, 2021 •

edited

Loading